7 Comments
Sep 4Liked by Emmet Penney

Julien Jumox has a substack about the complementary value of solar and wind. It's clear on a seasonal basis. It's not as good weekly. Hourly it breaks down

As an Excel Energy guy said on a Fire 2 Fission episode I heard yesterday - our plan to replace coal by 2030 is wind, solar and hope that batteries advance enough to maybe come up 7

Expand full comment
Sep 8Liked by Emmet Penney

Wake me up when batteries can last a week while remaining affordable.

Expand full comment

I think that most people simply do not understand the complications of keeping an electrical grid running 24/7/365. It seems deceptively easy, but devilishly difficult when you get into the details.

And then you add in great variations in the availability of solar and wind energy by region, it gets damn near impossible to see a global Green solution for the foreseeable future.

Expand full comment

As a commodity trader I fully admit to a gambling addiction. However, there is just one caveat with what you say here. Since the odds so much favor dependable energy sources, they just make a better bet for those of us who do not want to ever be washed out of the markets. Actually they are also more predictable, too. While climate models are hitting wrong just about 100%, the weather reports are just too random for me .....

Expand full comment

What are the different colors on that Germany chart? It's missing a key.

I presume that the yellow is solar, and maybe light green is wind, but I'd rather not guess..

Expand full comment

I notice that any mention of energy storage - whether grid-scale or distributed - is entirely and conspicuously absent from this post..

Expand full comment

GHE theory says w/o it Earth would become a -18 C ice ball.

Wrong.

TFK_bams09 GHE balance graphic duplicates 63 & assumes surface upwells 396 W/m^2 of “extra” energy.

Wrong.

GHE theory assumes Earth’s surface radiates a 396 BB/333 “back”/2nd 63 forcing loop.

Wrong.

3 strikes=out!

Expand full comment